[ad_1]
By .
For Johnny Depp’s authorized staff, any impact his trial towards Amber Heard might need on society is totally unintended.
On Wednesday, attorneys Camille Vasquez and Ben Chew sat down with Savannah Guthrie on “Immediately” to debate the trial and its verdict final week, that Heard defamed her ex-husband with an op-ed alleging she was a survivor of home abuse.
READ MORE:
Johnny Depp Creates A TikTok Account, Amber Heard Reacts: ‘Women’s Rights Are Moving Backward’
Requested about some notion that the decision could also be a setback for the #MeToo motion, Vasquez pushed again: “We’re right here to speak in regards to the case that we tried, proper? We encourage all victims to come back ahead, have their day in court docket, which is strictly what occurred on this case.”
EXCLUSIVE: Johnny Depp’s attorneys say they “don’t” see a bigger message past the decision within the actor’s defamation case.
“We encourage all victims to come back ahead and have their day in court docket.” pic.twitter.com/Zvx8MzfBI1
— TODAY (@TODAYshow) June 8, 2022
Discussing what might need led the jury to its verdict, which discovered three situations of defamation by Heard towards Depp, together with one occasion by a member of Depp’s authorized staff towards Heard, Chew prompt that it “had loads to do with accountability, that Johnny owned his points. He was very candid about his alcohol and drug points. He was candidate about some unlucky texts that he wrote, and I believe it was a pointy distinction to Miss Heard, who… the jury could have perceived that she didn’t take accountability for something.”
The pair additionally addressed feedback final week by Heard’s lawyer Elaine Bredehoft that the jury was denied proof, together with therapist notes, which might have bolstered her shopper’s case.
“I believe it was very disappointing to listen to that and to listen to her impugn the character of the jury,” Chew stated. “The proof that got here in ought to [have] are available in, and the choose was very reasonable to each side.”
READ MORE:
Stenographer In Johnny Depp Vs. Amber Heard Trial Says A ‘Few’ Jurors Fell Asleep In Court
Bredehoft had additionally famous that Heard was not allowed to deliver into proof a U.Ok. court docket’s ruling towards Depp in his defamation case towards the Solar over an article calling him a “spouse beater.”
“That was a special course of, proper?” Vasquez instructed Guthrie. “And likewise Mr. Depp and Miss Heard on this case have been events, that they had totally different disclosure obligations. We disagree. The overwhelming proof that was introduced on this case in Virginia, far exceeded what was introduced within the U.Ok., and we imagine the jury bought it proper.”
EXCLUSIVE: Johnny Depp’s lawyer Ben Chew responds to Amber Heard’s lawyer’s claims that the jury had not been permitted to see proof that might have “bolstered and verified” Heard’s claims of abuse.
“The choose was very reasonable to each side.” pic.twitter.com/7Jwe59YuG1
— TODAY (@TODAYshow) June 8, 2022
Requested about Heard’s lawyer indicating they’re more likely to attraction final week’s jury verdict, Chew responded, “We really feel very assured that there aren’t any errors that might justify any type of profitable attraction.”
READ MORE:
Johnny Depp Celebrates Amber Heard Trial Win In The U.K.
The pair have been additionally requested about Depp’s response to the decision.
“I believe simply an awesome sense of reduction,” Vasquez stated. “I used to be talking with one other pal of ours, a mutual pal of Johnny’s and ours, and he stated, ‘I haven’t seen Johnny smile like that in six years.’”
Previous to Chew and Vasquez’s look on “Immediately”, a spokesperson for Heard launched an announcement addressing the interview.
“It’s as unseemly as it’s unprofessional that Johnny Depp’s authorized staff has chosen to do a victory lap for setting again a long time of how girls might be handled within the courtroom,” they instructed ET Canada. “What’s subsequent? A film deal and merchandising?”
[ad_2]
Source link
